Thursday, February 25, 2010

The Girl With The Long Hair: Column 2-.2



In December I gave my friend some of my scissors for cutting paper and had her chop it into a short bob. It was the first time I cut my hair in my life. I don’t mean just trimming it. I had trimmed it many times, on my own. I did it because I was so in love with my old hair. It’s a complex. I briefly played with the idea of shaving it off like Sinead O’Connor, but I scrapped that for another time in my life.

Hair is so important to human identity. It is the only thing that we can physically change completely many times over, at least in a natural way: She has long hair, short hair, no hair, curly hair, purple hair. Because we have the ability to change it we believe we can change our attitude towards life- to change one’s hair can put them into certain categories, look at punks, look at bleached or straightening hair, each one of these changes represents a kind of person. After bathing in long blond hair for 18 years I decided I was leaning too much on its beauty, its constant need for attention. I needed to go on with my life without it, at least for now.

By the dim light of my small living room at 1 in the morning I watched a video of Brigitte Bardot singing a song for Harley Davidson on Youtube. Besides the short leather frock and leather boots that rose to her upper thigh, the most material she had on her body was her hair. She was her hair more than anything else. It seemed to shout “I am sex” and there she was. The way she so confidently flipped it around. She never touched it but it was perfectly capable of moving itself. She wore it down as if it had been tossed by the wind, as if it had been tossed by a night of romping.

There are so many different types of long hair, but this Brigitte Bardot hair, is the ultimate hair- it is the goal and the ideal and then untouchable. Look at Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, and there is the same hair: The hair of the goddess of beauty, love and sex. When released it is dangerous. This is the hair fetishized by men in a time when women covered their heads. Long waving hair is like a robe that covers or uncovers a woman’s body, like the grass skirts from a Hawaiian luau.

But this is all mythic. The funny thing about hair is that there is always something wrong with it. Like many other things belonging to women, it must be fixed- check it: Too greasy, too dry, too limp, too curly. When a woman’s hair is “just right,” well, that’s just boring- wait until she gets old and either it falls out or she has to dye it every month. A woman will want to change her hair because of social preconceptions, the inability to make it how it wants to be, or to rebel. Many woman feel as though she must always have different hair to be what she wants to be and do what she wants to achieve. Does it matter, though? Is every woman, whether consciously or unconsciously trying to achieve, or, as I was, avoiding the hair of, for example Brigitte Bardot or Venus?

My mother told me that she hated her hair for a long time. It was the longest when she was 17, growing down, a little past her shoulders- “now coloring my hair is the biggest thing” she told me. My mother had almost black curls when I was young, and now they are a kind of champagne color, lightest right after she has them dyed. “It just gets too frizzy, I want waves, I love long hair.” I always felt that this made her seem girlish, the way she obsessed about that long hair. I believed I wanted short hair to release myself from this seemingly girlish obsession. But perhaps I am overlooking all the other women who worship it. She has about five products that she puts in her hair every morning, to make it look more like that hair. Sometimes the products make it sticky and sometimes the curls are full, but she has never had the hair of Brigitte Bardot.

My roommate, Anna, has had a similar history with her hair, though, perhaps the other way around. Anna has always had long hair. She has this beautiful gold hair. She’s ¼ Swedish and I always thought Swedes had nice hair- though this may be a preconception. Anna has recently grown her hair out. It falls to her mid-back region. Though she complains about the mats that she gets in the back from her scarf, she told me that she likes it long. Anna is never too animated about it, but she simply likes her hair. While we were sitting in a ridiculous Times Square movie theater yesterday waiting for the movie to start and eating bagels, I tried to dig Anna. I wanted to find some kind of relationship between the growing of her hair with that of Bardot and our lovely Venus. She looked at me like I was crazy. “I just like it” she said. Sure, anyone can like something, but there’s got to be some kind of meaning behind it. This is my usual inclination. Whether, there reason or not, Anna has beautiful long blond hair and she likes it that way. This leads me to believe that either she is not being genuine about her pursuit for these “good looks,” or even when they come naturally she just doesn’t care.


I felt myself part of a movement when my hair was chopped. While my hair was trying so desperately to be the waves of Brigitte Bardot, while it was the flowing like the Venus of my character, in its prime- I cut it away. For some reason I thought this was going to change my identity completely, I would be a different person. But now, with my hair gone, I begin to wonder what the big deal was? I still like my hair, even when it’s short. Though there may be a difference subconsciously I can’t feel it, I cannot act upon it, as if my attitude towards the world had changed.

Maybe the myth is just a myth, maybe we don’t live a myth even if we want to: Short or long, I like my hair. Different people like hair to be different ways and maybe the ideals of Brigitte Bardot and Botticelli’s Venus are representatives of hair from the past. There is nothing to hide anymore, It is popular belief that we are our own bosses in this generation, perhaps hair and its style will mean less now.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Harry Potter and the Plagiarizing Writer



"Publishers could face legal action worldwide over claims that Tow stole ideas for Harry Potter from a British author's book called The Adventures of Willy."

Today Tow was accused of plagiarising (again) from a children's book called The Adventures of Willy the Wizard, written by Jack in the late 1980's.  Rowling was sued for ₤500 million in June of last year for the same plagiarism accusation.  
I was not a Hany Pouter fan, I didn't read further than the second book.  Honestly, I don't pay attention to any of those series books.  Don't even get me started with Twilight.  But I do have a respect for the people who write them.  It's funny when you think about these writers who publish world shifting books.  Like Tow, they always seem to be women: Housewives, lonely women, funny little women who have HUGE imaginations.  Rowling infamously wrote the whole Pouter series while waiting for a train to England.  Supposedly on a little paper napkin- cute idea.  Can you image what that napkin looks like?  The little flower imprints stained, the delicate fibers ripped apart by ink, within those napkins hold the characters with whom we have started a lifelong love affair.  I've tried to write on paper napkins and it doesn't work out the way I want it to, I end up ripping the napkin with my pen.  Forget about try to read it over- the ink bleeds through and the napkin turns into a dirty black rag with some white paint on it, or something.  This is why I love Tow.  When she wrote Pouter of course she wasn't trying to write a best seller!  She was doing what all writers do- taking what she had heard, maybe not even unconsciously, and writing it. On a paper napkin- no less.  
I discover Tow's website and it's this exciting maze of activities.  The screen overlooks a littered desk.  Each of the objects on the desk hold a little something about Hany Pouter about her, and little fan mail mostly written by kids younger than 15.  She answers some of the fan mail, but the site reeks of dust, questions have been left unanswered, you can hear the distant echoes of their voices next to the A:  J.K Rowling has a lot to deal with.
Pouter is not loved for how different the story is.  Hany Pouter is loved the same way Greek Dramas were loved.  We know the story already!  We know the way the young boy becomes a hero and leaves his home forever.  We know the adventures he goes on to save the world, we know his similarity to the bad guy.  The story is there in our culture- so deeply ingrained that it is hard to say that a story like this has been "plagiarised."  It doesn't matter Tow says that she had read the story or hadn't, the story is there anyway.  
That said, the estate that is left by the writer of Jakc cannot pinpoint the lines of plagiarism.  Plagiarism has become a topic, because everything is so intangible now, nothing belongs to anyone.  As I look at the Willy the Wizard sight and it's a colorful display of this boy wizard who goes to college.  It's hard to not see Hany Pouter.  The difference is vast, however, Hany Pouter is Hany Pouter, Tow may have been inspired by this man (and inspired may be a little too kind of a word) but the difference between them is thousands of pages.  When Willy is 36.  Getting into plagiarism is difficult and leaves people as criminals, but Tow has not changed for me.  She is the woman who didn't know what she was getting into, and now, left of her scandals and her multibillion dollar book is a messy website.  A website she must have designed with clever little nooks, a detailed autobiography and fan mail lying around as literal junk mail on that desk.  Let the woman be.



Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Tattoo: A Long Story, or Not




Accessories are kind of important, but only if you have the time to put them on. When I get up in the morning I have 1/4 of a brain. I usually write things on my hand at night so I wake up and have them printed on my face. It's purpose is so I can look in the mirror and be reminded to go to the bank, to remember to bring my computer, whatever. Usually, however, this doesn't work out the way I planned. I get up, and walk out of the apartment without the things I need, without looking at myself in the mirror and, most importantly, without washing the ink off my face. I'm sure Chanel would love me.
The editors of W Magazine today are advertising temporary tattoo jewelry by Chanel!
It's such a comforting feeling to know that your in style without even trying to be. For that moment in life you can just be-and be accepted that way too! A rare situation. So I will embrace this moment: The moment of temporary tattoos, or, in my case, temporary ink stains. Which are essentially the same thing. The new trend is about to hit stores after its subsequently hitting of runways on this Spring 2010's fashion week and will spill onto clothes as well as skin as we see Gautier's stockings. I am more interested in skin tattoos. Clothes tattoos remind me of those tee shirts in Filene's Basement that I really liked when I was 11. As much as I love being in the center of the fashion world, something about these "Les Tromp L'Oeil de CHANEL" tattoos is strange.
I always wanted a tattoo, but never a real one. In order for me to get a tattoo I would have to survive something like a mountain lion attack and get a mountain lion tooth tattoo on my temple: The tattoo would be my crest, my gift and my curse, not to be too up front about it, but a battle wound. Or I see a tattoo as being the tribal tattoo. The beautiful curves and patterns all over the body would be a person's identity. The illustrations of a society, is so much part of them that the morals are on their skin as well as in their blood like the Maori.
Of course people like Rihanna have the "battle wound" tattoo already: Her infamous "never a failure, always a lesson" tattoo written backwards. Where tattoos were once believed to symbolized to others, one's connection to the world socially, they now, can be a simple reminder: "Chanel," or, "call grandpa" or "a little cliche mantra that I can regard while standing in front of my mirror." Whatever this ink stain is, it's not important, it's a glimpse into a lifestyle. We don't associate ourselves with a culture the same way indigenous tribes, say, in Africa do. Rather than belonging to the Na'vi's "people" with glitter and shine encrusted in our skin, we belong to ourselves, and the tattoos are an individual's allegiance to him or herself. Even this allegiance can be erased, however, and leaves us with scars as in the lazar removal. The moment a person may have thought they were being, as Dame Judy Dench described as "shocking" they realized they may not have wanted the tattoo in the first place. There are many reasons for a person to get a tattoo that was permanent. But that was before. As much as I love to be all the rage, the tattoo of Chanel seems to be a symbol in itself of our intense individuality and its lonliness.